A federal appeals court upheld a New York jury’s guilty verdict finding President-elect Donald Trump liable in the E. Jean Carroll sex abuse and defamation case.
In May, the jury found that Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll – but that there was not enough evidence to say he had raped her.
The panel of six men and three women also found that Trump injured advice columnist Carroll in a Manhattan Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in 1996 and defamed her when he called her a liar, ordering him to pay a total of $5 million in damages.
They made their decision after just three hours of deliberation.
Trump has called the case the ‘greatest witch hunt of all time’ and slammed the verdict as a ‘disgrace.’
But the appeals court wrote in its opinion Monday that Trump ‘has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings.’
In September, Trump appeared at the federal appeals court in New York as his lawyers fought to overturn the verdict.
The former president’s motorcade was seen pulling up to the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan where attorneys presented oral arguments before a panel of three judges – all of whom were appointed to the bench by Democratic presidents.
Dressed in his trademark navy suit and bright red tie, Trump entered the courtroom and walked straight past Carroll, who was sitting in the front row of the public gallery.
It marks the presidential candidate’s first time in court since his assassination attempt in July, and security was tight, with attendees required to go through metal detectors upon arrival.
Donald Trump appeared in court in New York on Friday as his lawyers fought to overturn the verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll
In his two-minute rebuttal, Trump’s attorney John Sauer called the case ‘a textbook example of implausible allegations’ and a ‘quintessential ‘he said, she said’ case’
All phones and other electronics were banned from the courtroom.
He contested the May 2023 verdict stemming from his alleged mid-1990s encounter with Carroll, who claimed Trump sexually assaulted her at Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room and later defamed her when he publicly denied her allegations.
His attorneys claimed the trial court erred by allowing in certain evidence such as the infamous Access Hollywood tape, in which Trump can be heard boasting about grabbing women’s genitals, as well as testimony from other women who have accused him of sexual misconduct decades ago.
In his two-minute rebuttal, Trump’s attorney John Sauer called the case ‘a textbook example of implausible allegations being propped up by highly inflammatory, inadmissible’ evidence.
He also reiterated Trump’s claims from his testimony that the presidential candidate has never ‘even met’ Carroll.
Addressing the panel, Sauer called the lawsuit a ‘quintessential ‘he said, she said’ case’ that was lacking in ‘physical evidence’, ‘eyewitnesses’, and police records.
Circuit Judge Denny Chin interrupted Sauer’s argument, noting it’s ‘very hard to overturn a jury verdict based on evidentiary rulings’ and asked him why the verdict should be thrown out.
Sauer questioned US District Judge Lewis Kaplan’s decision to allow the Access Hollywood tape and testimony from Jessica Leeds, who accused Trump of groping her on a plane in the late 1970s, to be heard as evidence.
Carroll, who claimed she was sexually assaulted by Trump at a department store dressing room in the 1990s, was also present at the hearing on Friday
The former president’s motorcade was seen pulling up to the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Friday morning
Protesters holding up placards reading ‘guilty’, ‘rapist’ and ‘felon’, gathered outside the Manhattan federal appeals court on Friday ahead of the hearing
He argued that the statute that would deem Trump’s alleged conduct a crime wasn’t enacted until 15 years later.
But Judge Chin asked if Trump ‘put his hands up her skirt’, wouldn’t that count?
Sauer reiterated that Leeds’s evidence should have been excluded.
Judge Chin pressed Sauer further about the Access Hollywood tape and said that it was a ‘confession about a modus operandi’.
Responding to Sauer’s arguments before the panel, Carroll’s attorney Roberta Kaplan stood by the evidence presented at the trial.
She insisted that Leeds’s testimony was admissible under a law that was in effect in 1979, and therefore the incident would have been considered a crime as the trial judge, Lewis Kaplan, concluded.
The lawyer also argued that Trump has a ‘pattern’ of attacking women that begins with ‘pleasantly chatting’ them up before suddenly ‘pouncing’ on them and subsequently trashing the women when he is accused.
She added that Trump had refused to testify or even attend the trial despite being given the opportunity.
A jury found that Trump was liable for sexually assaulting Carroll, a journalist, in the mid-1990s.
Jurors awarded the former Elle magazine advice columnist $2.02million and $2.98million for her sexual assault and defamation claims respectively, in a May 2023 judgment.
Trump’s attorney presented oral arguments before a three-judge panel consisting of circuit judges Denny Chin, Susan Carney, and Myrna Perez – all of whom were appointed to the bench by Democratic presidents
Carroll departed court flanked by her attorney Roberta Kaplan, who said she stood by the evidence presented at the trial
The writer, who was wore dark blazer and suit with a navy blue hair ribbon, did not talk with reporters after arguments ended
Trump was separately found liable for defaming Carroll in a second trial that took place in January this year where a jury ordered him to pay her $83.3million for having defamed her and damaging her reputation in June 2019 after she first accused him of rape.
In both denials, Trump said he didn’t know Carroll, that she was ‘not my type,’ and that she made up her story to promote her memoir.
In their appeal, filed in November, Trump’s lawyers claimed he couldn’t get a fair trial in New York.
The former president claimed that Judge Kaplan ‘erred’ in rulings during the May 2023 trial that ‘violated President Trump’s rights’.
The filing stated: ‘The improper verdict in this case is a gross miscarriage of justice, backed by political operatives long opposed to President Trump and his politics, based on false and unsupported claims’
In other legal filings, Trump’s lawyers claimed the attack on Carroll ‘never occurred’.
He accused her of making up the claims because of her ‘significant political bias against him’ and ‘turned her allegations against (Trump) into a lifestyle and sought to monetize her allegations as much as possible’.
Rather than being harmed by the claims, Carroll’s standing has improved due to her media interviews, Trump’s lawyers claimed.
Trump spoke to the media during a press conference at Trump Tower after the court hearing
Trump took the stand during the second civil trial where E. Jean Carroll accused Trump of raping her decades ago, at Manhattan Federal Court in January
Carroll’s cases are separate from multiple criminal cases against the former US president.
He was found guilty in state court in New York for falsifying business records relating to a $130,000 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels.
Trump was found guilty on all 34 counts earlier this year after a blockbuster trial.
Trump denies all the allegations.
This article was originally published by a www.dailymail.co.uk . Read the Original article here. .